<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is the best linux distribution for an older computer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Popsmear</title>
		<link>http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>Popsmear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>Something like Ubuntu or Debian would work fine. 

http://www.ubuntu.com/products/WhatIsUbuntu/desktopedition
http://www.debian.org/

Gnome is another popular choice:
http://www.gnome.org/

Puppy Linix runs only in RAM, that might be a good choice for an older computer with a slower processor:
http://www.puppylinux.org/

Another good distro for a slower computer is VectorLinux. I have seen it run on much slower PC&#039;s than yours:
http://vectorlinux.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something like Ubuntu or Debian would work fine. </p>
<p>http://www.ubuntu.com/products/WhatIsUbuntu/desktopedition<br />
http://www.debian.org/</p>
<p>Gnome is another popular choice:<br />
http://www.gnome.org/</p>
<p>Puppy Linix runs only in RAM, that might be a good choice for an older computer with a slower processor:<br />
http://www.puppylinux.org/</p>
<p>Another good distro for a slower computer is VectorLinux. I have seen it run on much slower PC&#8217;s than yours:<br />
http://vectorlinux.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dust180</title>
		<link>http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>dust180</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>i have a 366mhz laptop wit 40gb and ATI RAGE Mobility P/M and i ran Ubuntu Linux Beryl on it and it ran great for such a slow pc it was nice and fast so got wit it u wont be disappointed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a 366mhz laptop wit 40gb and ATI RAGE Mobility P/M and i ran Ubuntu Linux Beryl on it and it ran great for such a slow pc it was nice and fast so got wit it u wont be disappointed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colinc</title>
		<link>http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>Colinc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>You can load Suse, Fedora (although it is a bit resource heavy), Ubuntu and many others. Limit the services running on the machine for best performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can load Suse, Fedora (although it is a bit resource heavy), Ubuntu and many others. Limit the services running on the machine for best performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David 19</title>
		<link>http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>David 19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>Linux doesn&#039;t need a lot of resources like Windows.  You should be able to install Fedora on your PC without any trouble at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux doesn&#8217;t need a lot of resources like Windows.  You should be able to install Fedora on your PC without any trouble at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z??mjet???</title>
		<link>http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>z??mjet???</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>puppy linux might be a good choice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>puppy linux might be a good choice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elana</title>
		<link>http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Elana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codebrothers.org/what-is-the-best-linux-distribution-for-an-older-computer/#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>Oh, most of the distributions will allow you to run some subset on that ... 80GB?  That&#039;s all outdoors.

I thought you were going to ask about getting Linux to run on your 486 (you can!).

If you don&#039;t run X (the windowing system), 512MB will be more then enough.  If you do run X, you&#039;ll want to make sure that you run relatively few graphical apps at the same time.  Also turn off whatever services you don&#039;t need that get started at boot time.

If you really want to customize to get the last little bit of bang for your buck, I&#039;d recommend &quot;gentoo&quot; which will allow you to compile the kernel for exactly the processor you need as well as just the tools - not for the faint of heart.

Really, you can do that with most of them - but gentoo is really setup to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, most of the distributions will allow you to run some subset on that &#8230; 80GB?  That&#8217;s all outdoors.</p>
<p>I thought you were going to ask about getting Linux to run on your 486 (you can!).</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t run X (the windowing system), 512MB will be more then enough.  If you do run X, you&#8217;ll want to make sure that you run relatively few graphical apps at the same time.  Also turn off whatever services you don&#8217;t need that get started at boot time.</p>
<p>If you really want to customize to get the last little bit of bang for your buck, I&#8217;d recommend &quot;gentoo&quot; which will allow you to compile the kernel for exactly the processor you need as well as just the tools &#8211; not for the faint of heart.</p>
<p>Really, you can do that with most of them &#8211; but gentoo is really setup to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
